Physically Grounded Vision-Language Models
for Robotic Manipulation


  • Jensen Gao
  • Bidipta Sarkar
  • Fei Xia
  • Ted Xiao
  • Jiajun Wu
  • Brian Ichter
  • Anirudha Majumdar
  • Dorsa Sadigh



Abstract

Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have led to improved performance on tasks such as visual question answering and image captioning. Consequently, these models are now well-positioned to reason about the physical world, particularly within domains such as robotic manipulation. However, current VLMs are limited in their understanding of the physical concepts (e.g., material, fragility) of common objects, which restricts their usefulness for robotic manipulation tasks that involve interaction and physical reasoning about such objects. To address this limitation, we propose PhysObjects, an object-centric dataset of 39.6K crowd-sourced and 417K automated physical concept annotations of common household objects. We demonstrate that fine-tuning a VLM on PhysObjects improves its understanding of physical object concepts, including generalization to held-out concepts, by capturing human priors of these concepts from visual appearance. We incorporate this physically-grounded VLM in an interactive framework with a large language model-based robotic planner, and show improved planning performance on tasks that require reasoning about physical object concepts, compared to baselines that do not leverage physically-grounded VLMs. We additionally illustrate the benefits of our physically-grounded VLM on a real robot, where it improves task success rates.

PhysObjects Dataset

To benchmark and improve VLMs for object-centric physical reasoning, we compiled the PhysObjects dataset, which contains 39.6K crowd-sourced and 417K automated physical concept annotations. The source of our images is the EgoObjects dataset. We collected annotations for eight physical concepts, listed in the table below. We chose these concepts based on prior work and what we believe to be userful for robotic manipulation. However, we do not consider concepts that would be difficult for humans to estimate from only images, such as friction.

Concept Description
Mass How heavy an object is
Fragility How easily an object can be broken/damaged
Deformability How easily an object can change shape without breaking
Material What an object is primarily made of
Transparency How much can be seen through an object
Contents What is inside a container
Can Contain Liquid If a container can be used to easily carry liquid
Is Sealed If a container will not spill if rotated
Density (held-out) How much mass per unit of volume of an object
Liquid Capacity (held-out) How much liquid a container can contain


Real Scene Planning Evaluation

Click on a scene image to go to the planning results for a task in that scene.

Scene 1: Countertop

Scene 2: Art Table

Scene 3: Floor

Scene 5: Kitchen B

Scene 7: Living Room

Scene 4: Kitchen A

Scene 6: Salad Bar

Scene 8: Shelf


Real Robot Evaluation

Click on a scene image to go to videos of all tasks for that scene.

Robot Scene 1

Robot Scene 2

Citation

Open Source

We open source the PG-InstructBLIP model [here]. We also open source the dataset [here].



The website template was borrowed from Jon Barron and RT-1